People v. Puglisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Puglisi

70 A.D.2d 646, 416 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12092

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Puglisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Puglisi, 70 A.D.2d 646, 416 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 20, 1978, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, indictment dismissed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The guilt of the defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Were we not reversing and dismissing the indictment, we would reverse and order a new trial because the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain checks, the cumulative effect of which was to unfairly prejudice the defendant. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 20, 1978, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, indictment dismissed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The guilt of the defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Were we not reversing and dismissing the indictment, we would reverse and order a new trial because the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain checks, the cumulative effect of which was to unfairly prejudice the defendant. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 646, 416 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-puglisi-nyappdiv-1979.