People v. Pryor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pryor

201 A.D.2d 756, 608 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 756 (People v. Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pryor, 201 A.D.2d 756, 608 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), rendered January 11, 1991, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree and sentenced as a second felony offender to a [757]*757term of imprisonment of ZV2 to 7 years. We find no merit to defendant’s contention that County Court erred in its charge to the jury. When read as a whole, County Court’s charge as to defendant’s justification defense was appropriate. Further, given defendant’s criminal record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), rendered January 11, 1991, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree and sentenced as a second felony offender to a [757]*757term of imprisonment of ZV2 to 7 years. We find no merit to defendant’s contention that County Court erred in its charge to the jury. When read as a whole, County Court’s charge as to defendant’s justification defense was appropriate. Further, given defendant’s criminal record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 756, 608 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pryor-nyappdiv-1994.