People v. Pryce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pryce

111 A.D.2d 415, 489 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 415 (People v. Pryce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pryce, 111 A.D.2d 415, 489 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered November 4, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was properly convicted of felony murder, intentional murder, burglary and criminal possession of a weapon. He did not prove the elements of the affirmative defense available to felony murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]; People v Santanella, 82 AD2d 869). The prosecutor’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35). The charge, as a whole, properly conveyed the law to the jury. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered November 4, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was properly convicted of felony murder, intentional murder, burglary and criminal possession of a weapon. He did not prove the elements of the affirmative defense available to felony murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]; People v Santanella, 82 AD2d 869). The prosecutor’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35). The charge, as a whole, properly conveyed the law to the jury. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 415, 489 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pryce-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack