People v. Pruitt

2019 NY Slip Op 730

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: February 1, 2019
• Docket: 116 KA 16-00731
• Status: Published

Opinion

People v Pruitt (2019 NY Slip Op 00730)

People v Pruitt

2019 NY Slip Op 00730

Decided on February 1, 2019

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

116 KA 16-00731

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

WILLIE J. PRUITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Stephen D. Aronson, A.J.), rendered February 11, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (two counts) and driving while intoxicated as a misdemeanor (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts each of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3] [a] [i]) and driving while intoxicated as a misdemeanor (§§ 1192 [2], [3]; 1193 [1] [b] [i]). Defendant was sentenced to, inter alia, a term of local incarceration and a fine of $1,500. Contrary to defendant's contention, the fine is not unduly harsh or severe. Defendant's further contention that the fine constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Abruzzese, 30 AD3d 219, 220 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 784 [2006]; see generally CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; People v Pena, 28 NY3d 727, 730 [2017]).

Entered: February 1, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court