People v. Pruitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pruitt

256 A.D.2d 425, 682 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 425 (People v. Pruitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pruitt, 256 A.D.2d 425, 682 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the [426]*426defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered November 9, 1995, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the [426]*426defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered November 9, 1995, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 425, 682 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pruitt-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack