People v. Prude

62 A.D.3d 914, 878 N.Y.S.2d 628
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered October 3, 2006, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentence actually imposed and, therefore, he has “no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive” (People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; see People v Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572 [2009]; People v Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630 [2008]). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Prude, 62 A.D.3d 914, 878 N.Y.S.2d 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

62 A.D.3d 914 (People v. Prude) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Caguana
69 A.D.3d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Ramos
67 A.D.3d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)