People v. Provencal

139 A.D.3d 1091, 30 N.Y.S.3d 853
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 2016·No. 2014-07880·Published

Opinion

Appeal by *1092 the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered July 16, 2014, as amended December 1, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). In any event, the defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d at 666; People v Narbonne, 131 AD3d 626, 627 [2015]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Provencal, 139 A.D.3d 1091, 30 N.Y.S.3d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 1091 (People v. Provencal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fiumefreddo
626 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Narbonne
131 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)