Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Provencal

People v. Provencal

139 A.D.3d 1091, 30 N.Y.S.3d 853
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 2016
Docket2014-07786
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 1091 (People v. Provencal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Provencal, 139 A.D.3d 1091, 30 N.Y.S.3d 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 16, 2014, as amended December 1, 2014, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Balkin, J.P, Leventhal, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 1091, 30 N.Y.S.3d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-provencal-nyappdiv-2016.