People v. Proskey

15 N.Y. Crim. 144, 32 Misc. 367, 66 N.Y.S. 736
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedAugust 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 N.Y. Crim. 144 (People v. Proskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Proskey, 15 N.Y. Crim. 144, 32 Misc. 367, 66 N.Y.S. 736 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Foster, J.

This is an application for leave to inspect and take a copy of the minutes of the grand jury in this case. The indictment is for “ criminally receiving stolen property.” The defendant was arraigned before the committing magistrate, pleaded not guilty, and demanded an examination, which was had at length, and at which both the defendant and the complainant were represented by counsel. The defendant was held and subsequently indicted. It is entirely within the discretion of the court to permit or deny an inspection of the minutes of the grand jury. People v. Molineux, 27 Misc. Rep. 60, and cases cited. It appears, however, to be, both upon principle and authority, the practice of this court to permit an inspection of the minutes of the grand jury, in a proper case, only, where there has been no preliminary ex[145]*145amination before the committing magistrate. The reasons for denying such inspection, where such examination has been had, appear to me so strong that I regret that I cannot grant this application, for otherwise the peculiar facts alleged would seem to entirely justify such an order. The defendant cannot be prejudiced by such ruling; he is' fully advised of the charges against him by the preliminary examination; and any motion which he desires to make may be made at the trial, as well as before it. True, he may be put to the trouble and expense of preparing for, and going to, trial, but that is the necessary, even if unfortunate, consequence of an indictment regularly found.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gellers
282 A.2d 173 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1971)
People v. Snyder
117 N.Y.S. 478 (Greene County Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 N.Y. Crim. 144, 32 Misc. 367, 66 N.Y.S. 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-proskey-nygensess-1900.