People v. Prophet

166 A.D.2d 887, 560 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12122
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, after a bench trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree, but acquitted of rape in the first degree and assault in the third degree. Defendant argues that his conviction is against the weight of the evidence because, in order to acquit defendant of rape and assault, the court necessarily must have concluded that the complainant’s testimony was completely incredible. We disagree. The sexual abuse occurred earlier in time and in a different location from the alleged rape and assault, and the court could have believed the complainant’s testimony concerning the earlier incident, but not believed her testimony concerning the later incident. Matters of credibility are best

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Prophet, 166 A.D.2d 887, 560 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Prophet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shawn A.
270 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)