People v. Pronce

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Pronce

168 N.W.2d 469, 16 Mich. App. 576, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1426

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 1969

DocketDocket No. 4,502

StatusPublished

This text of 168 N.W.2d 469 (People v. Pronce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pronce, 168 N.W.2d 469, 16 Mich. App. 576, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1426 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Ali Pronce was tried without a jury and convicted of larceny from the person of another contrary to CL 1948, § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). On appeal he contends that he was denied the right to effective assistance of counsel; that the evidence failed to establish his identity as the perpetrator of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt; and that he did not voluntarily [577]*577and intelligently waive the right to trial by jury. The appellee has filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

The defendant expressly waived a jury trial. At the trial witnesses identified the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime. Our examination of the record convinces us that the defendant was not denied the effective ' assistance of counsel. The questions presented here on appeal are unsubstantial and require no formal argument or submission.

The motion to affirm the defendant’s conviction is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant Ali Pronce was tried without a jury and convicted of larceny from the person of another contrary to CL 1948, § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). On appeal he contends that he was denied the right to effective assistance of counsel; that the evidence failed to establish his identity as the perpetrator of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt; and that he did not voluntarily [577]*577and intelligently waive the right to trial by jury. The appellee has filed a motion to affirm the conviction.

The defendant expressly waived a jury trial. At the trial witnesses identified the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime. Our examination of the record convinces us that the defendant was not denied the effective ' assistance of counsel. The questions presented here on appeal are unsubstantial and require no formal argument or submission.

The motion to affirm the defendant’s conviction is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 N.W.2d 469, 16 Mich. App. 576, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pronce-michctapp-1969.