People v. Pringle
169 N.W.2d 163, 17 Mich. App. 115, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1163
This text of 169 N.W.2d 163 (People v. Pringle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Pringle, 169 N.W.2d 163, 17 Mich. App. 115, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1163 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).
Opinion
Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon
As this Court stated in People v. Arither Thomas (1967), 7 Mich App 103,
“It is not the function of an appeMate court to be a reviewing jury. Our proper role is to examine the record on appeal to determine whether or not a finding of fact by the jury was supported by credible evidence. This Court will not disturb the verdict unless evidence fails to support the finding of fact by the jury.”
We have examined the record on appeal, and it does not fail to support the findings of the jury.
Affirmed.
CL 1948, § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Arither Thomas
151 N.W.2d 186 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
169 N.W.2d 163, 17 Mich. App. 115, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pringle-michctapp-1969.