People v. Primack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Primack

276 A.D.2d 268, 716 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 268 (People v. Primack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Primack, 276 A.D.2d 268, 716 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), rendered February 8, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree and conspiracy in the fifth degree, sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years and 6 months, and directing $36,000 in restitution payments, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison sentence to time served, and otherwise affirmed.

Solely in light of defendant’s extraordinary medical circumstances and the lack of opposition by the People, we conclude that the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice to the extent indicated. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), rendered February 8, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree and conspiracy in the fifth degree, sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years and 6 months, and directing $36,000 in restitution payments, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison sentence to time served, and otherwise affirmed.

Solely in light of defendant’s extraordinary medical circumstances and the lack of opposition by the People, we conclude that the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice to the extent indicated. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 268, 716 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-primack-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack