People v. Priebe

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Priebe

192 N.W.2d 644, 35 Mich. App. 422

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 10617

StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.W.2d 644 (People v. Priebe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Priebe, 192 N.W.2d 644, 35 Mich. App. 422 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On April 13, 1970, defendant Patrick William Priebe and codefendant Raymond McKamey were convicted of larceny over $100 (MCLA § 750.356 [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.588]) by a jury and were sentenced.

On appeal the defendant argues that a police officer was permitted to give expert opinion testimony eoneerciing footprints allegedly left by the defendant at the scene of the crime. A reading of the transcript reveals that this testimony was excluded.

Defendant’s contention that the prosecutor erroneously failed to introduce the shoes that left the footprints in question is without merit. No objection to this omission was made at trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI