People v. Priddle

199 A.D.2d 701, 605 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Priddle. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 A.D.2d 736

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered July 29, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that his sentence of 2V¿ to 5 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment. In addition, defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed. Given these facts, as well as defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Priddle, 199 A.D.2d 701, 605 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Priddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.