People v. Priddle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Priddle

199 A.D.2d 701, 605 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11959

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Priddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Priddle, 199 A.D.2d 701, 605 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered July 29, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that his sentence of 2V¿ to 5 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment. In addition, defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed. Given these facts, as well as defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered July 29, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that his sentence of 2V¿ to 5 years’ imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment. In addition, defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed. Given these facts, as well as defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 701, 605 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-priddle-nyappdiv-1993.