People v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Price

89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 591 (People v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Price, 89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Owens, J.), dated February 26,1982, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings on the indictment. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the indictment for arson in the third degree, as there was testimony before the Grand Jury that the building was damaged by a fire which had been started in three places and that defendant admitted setting the fire. Under the circumstances, the proof was sufficient to sustain the indictment. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Owens, J.), dated February 26,1982, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings on the indictment. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the indictment for arson in the third degree, as there was testimony before the Grand Jury that the building was damaged by a fire which had been started in three places and that defendant admitted setting the fire. Under the circumstances, the proof was sufficient to sustain the indictment. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-price-nyappdiv-1982.