People v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Price

44 A.D.2d 575, 353 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 575 (People v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Price, 44 A.D.2d 575, 353 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County, imposed June 27, 1973, upon a conviction of robbery in the third degree, on a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term not to exceed four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a prison term of time served plus a period of probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court for the fixing of the period of probation and the conditions thereof. In our opinion, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County, imposed June 27, 1973, upon a conviction of robbery in the third degree, on a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term not to exceed four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a prison term of time served plus a period of probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court for the fixing of the period of probation and the conditions thereof. In our opinion, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 575, 353 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-price-nyappdiv-1974.