People v. Price

244 Mich. 643
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 4, 1928
DocketDocket No. 132, Calendar No. 33,908
StatusPublished

This text of 244 Mich. 643 (People v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Price, 244 Mich. 643 (Mich. 1928).

Opinion

Clark, J.

Defendant, in a trial before tbe court without a jury, suffered conviction and judgment thereon of driving a vehicle on a highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Section 3, tit. 3, Act No. 318, Pub. Acts 1927. He prosecutes review on certiorari.

The code of criminal procedure (chapter 10, Act No. 175, Pub. Acts 1927), provides for review after judgment by writ of error, and it provides no other method, and it states:

“All-acts and parts of acts relative to exceptions before sentence in criminal cases, and all other provisions of law inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, are hereby expressly repealed.”

The right of appeal or review is statutory. It follows that the writ of certiorari, granted improvidently, must be dismissed.

For benefit of counsel, it is stated that a consideration of the merits would not change the result.

Writ dismissed.

Fead, C. J., and North, Fellows, Wiest, McDonald, Potter, and Sharpe, J J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 Mich. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-price-mich-1928.