People v. Prible

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Prible

124 A.D.2d 1006, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62341

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D.2d 1006 (People v. Prible) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Prible, 124 A.D.2d 1006, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant raises on appeal the same issues raised by his codefendant on an earlier appeal to this court (see, People v Riddell, 115 AD2d 986). Our memorandum decision on the Riddell appeal is dispositive of those issues and a reversal is required. We add only that defendant’s claim that the evidence was insufficient as a. matter of law to support the convictions is without merit and that except as otherwise held in our memorandum decision in Riddell, it was not error to permit cross-examination of defendant on his prior bad acts. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J. — robbery, first degree, and reckless endangerment, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Defendant raises on appeal the same issues raised by his codefendant on an earlier appeal to this court (see, People v Riddell, 115 AD2d 986). Our memorandum decision on the Riddell appeal is dispositive of those issues and a reversal is required. We add only that defendant’s claim that the evidence was insufficient as a. matter of law to support the convictions is without merit and that except as otherwise held in our memorandum decision in Riddell, it was not error to permit cross-examination of defendant on his prior bad acts. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J. — robbery, first degree, and reckless endangerment, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D.2d 1006, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-prible-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack