People v. Prevo

167 A.D.2d 960, 563 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Prevo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Prevo, 167 A.D.2d 960, 563 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court correctly determined that the stop of defendant’s vehicle was based upon reasonable suspicion of criminal activity (see, People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 622-623; United States v Rickus, 737 F2d 360). The subsequent observation of the empty holster and ammunition was sufficient to provide the officers with probable cause to search the passenger compartment of the vehicle (see, People v Ellis, 62 NY2d 393). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—attempted robbery, first degree.) Presentr—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Diaz
213 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 960, 563 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-prevo-nyappdiv-1990.