People v. Presley
196 N.W.2d 31, 38 Mich. App. 285
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of assault with intent to rob while armed, and appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.
Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission. People v Malkowski, 385 Mich 244, 247 (1971).
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Presley, 196 N.W.2d 31, 38 Mich. App. 285 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
196 N.W.2d 31 (People v. Presley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Malkowski
188 N.W.2d 559 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1971)