People v. Prego

102 A.D.3d 814, 957 N.Y.S.2d 872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2013·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered November 16, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, identification testimony, and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly found that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant (see People v Copela, 97 AD3d 760 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 1024 [2012]). Accordingly, the court properly denied

[815]*815that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, identification testimony, and his statements to law enforcement officials. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Prego, 102 A.D.3d 814, 957 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 814 (People v. Prego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anderson
2017 NY Slip Op 5615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Campbell
120 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Sanders
119 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Yunga
110 A.D.3d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)