People v. Prastien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Prastien

286 A.D.2d 740, 730 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 740 (People v. Prastien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Prastien, 286 A.D.2d 740, 730 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered October 6, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not, and could not, raise any nonfrivolous [741]*741issues in his supplemental brief. Altman, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered October 6, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not, and could not, raise any nonfrivolous [741]*741issues in his supplemental brief. Altman, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 740, 730 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-prastien-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack