People v. Prandy (Carlos)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 14, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 50717(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Prandy (Carlos) (People v. Prandy (Carlos)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Prandy (Carlos), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Carlos M. Binett Prandy, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered December 13, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating New York Public Health Law § 229, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), dated December 13, 2017, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and fine, if paid, remitted.

The terse plea colloquy fails to establish that defendant understood the nature of the offense to which he was pleading, and that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Given the relatively minor nature of the infraction here charged, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of remanding the matter (see People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]).

We note the absence of a respondent's brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 14, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Burwell
422 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Prandy (Carlos), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-prandy-carlos-nyappterm-2019.