People v. Praetz
This text of 115 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Praetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Aid-rich, J.), rendered December 8, 1981, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel do not warrant reversal since neither inadequacy nor ineffectiveness was demonstrated; nor could defense counsel be described as lacking reasonable competence (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Moreover, the trial court did not err in refusing to charge the jury with assault in the third degree as a lesser [625]*625included offense since assault in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 120.05 (3) requires proof only of an intent to prevent a peace officer from performing a lawful duty and does not require proof of intent to cause physical injury, an essential element of assault in the third degree (People ex rel. Gray v Tekben, 57 NY2d 651, affg 86 AD2d 176; People v Lett, 67 AD2d 1077). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 624, 496 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-praetz-nyappdiv-1985.