People v. Praete

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Praete

150 Misc. 2d 389, 575 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1991 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 608

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 Misc. 2d 389 (People v. Praete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Praete, 150 Misc. 2d 389, 575 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1991 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Since the defendant actually passed a speed limit sign, it was unnecessary for the People to establish that area speed limit signs were posted at the entrances to the village (see, People v Lord, 29 Misc 2d 685). We also note our agreement with the conclusion of the court below that the testimony of the officer as to the size of the sign sufficiently established its conformity to legal requirements, even assuming that the highway on which defendant was traveling was a "Four lane conventional highway” (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 [d]; 17 NYCRR 200.5, 201.2 [h] [3] [iii]).

Stark, J. P., Collins and Ingrassia, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Since the defendant actually passed a speed limit sign, it was unnecessary for the People to establish that area speed limit signs were posted at the entrances to the village (see, People v Lord, 29 Misc 2d 685). We also note our agreement with the conclusion of the court below that the testimony of the officer as to the size of the sign sufficiently established its conformity to legal requirements, even assuming that the highway on which defendant was traveling was a "Four lane conventional highway” (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 [d]; 17 NYCRR 200.5, 201.2 [h] [3] [iii]).

Stark, J. P., Collins and Ingrassia, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 Misc. 2d 389, 575 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1991 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-praete-nyappterm-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack