People v. Powers
202 A.D.2d 978, 610 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3336
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Powers. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D.2d 886 →
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The jury was entitled to credit complainant’s version of the incident over defendant’s (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We find the sentence imposed neither harsh nor excessive. The issue raised by defendant pro se is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, Jr., J.— Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Powers, 202 A.D.2d 978, 610 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
202 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)