People v. Powell

179 Misc. 2d 1047, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 384
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 16, 1999·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[1048] OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

The People in the case at bar announced their readiness on the 91st day after commencement of the action as the 90th day fell on a Sunday (see, CPL 30.30 [1] [b]; 1.20 [17]). The court, in dismissing the accusatory instrument, held that the provisions of General Construction Law § 25-a (1) are not applicable to CPL 30.30. Section 25-a (1) of the General Construction Law provides that it is applicable when any period of time ends on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday. The General Construction Law should be read into every statute subsequently enacted, unless the wording of said statute plainly expresses a contrary intent (see, 97 NY Jur 2d, Statutes, § 99). Since CPL 30.30 does not express a contrary intent, the provisions of said section of the General Construction Law are applicable and the People’s time to announce their readiness was extended to the next business day (see, People v Velasquez, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1997, at 30, col 4 [Crim Ct, Kings County]).

Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Powell, 179 Misc. 2d 1047, 690 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

179 Misc. 2d 1047 (People v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vergara
2025 NY Slip Op 51120(U) (Bronx Criminal Court, 2025)
People v. Pierre (Kimberly)
2024 NY Slip Op 51181(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Mandela
142 A.D.3d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Douglas
2003 NY Slip Op 23921 (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2003)
In re Douglas
2 Misc. 3d 662 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
People v. Bendter
184 Misc. 2d 374 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2000)