Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Powell

People v. Powell

448 N.E.2d 797, 58 N.Y.2d 1009, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2951
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 448 N.E.2d 797 (People v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Powell, 448 N.E.2d 797, 58 N.Y.2d 1009, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2951 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It cannot be said that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charge of burglary in the third degree simply because the building housed attorneys’ offices and the front door was unlocked. Subdivision 5 of section 140.00 of the Penal Law provides that “A person who * * * enters or remains in or upon premises which are at the time open to the public does so with license and privilege unless he defies a lawful order not to enter or remain” (emphasis supplied). The jury could find on the evidence before it that though defendant’s entry was licensed, he was not licensed to remain because it was apparent after his entry from the time of the day and the absence of any persons in the reception area or individual offices that the building was not “at the time open to the public”.

Nor was it error to decline to charge as requested that “the fact that defendant might have entered with criminal intent does not extinguish his otherwise existing license to *1011 enter if the jury finds that such a license exists” (cf. People v Brown, 25 NY2d 374). Under the circumstances of this case, the requested charge was irrelevant, the only issue being whether defendant remained after discovering that the apparent license to enter did not exist because the building was not at the time open to the public. On that question the charge as given was sufficient.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKay v. City of New York
32 F. Supp. 3d 499 (S.D. New York, 2014)
People v. Bethune
65 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Barksdale
50 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Terry
2 A.D.3d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Tyshawn J.
304 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. McKeever
295 A.D.2d 541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. White
276 A.D.2d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Watson
221 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Pratt
164 Misc. 2d 498 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1995)
People v. Clarke
185 A.D.2d 124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Gentry v. State
595 So. 2d 548 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
People v. DeLarosa
172 A.D.2d 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Johnson
162 A.D.2d 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Graves
555 N.E.2d 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Milo
155 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Cunningham
153 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Commissioner of Transportation v. Lane
144 Misc. 2d 680 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Eady
151 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Gaines
147 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. James
138 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 N.E.2d 797, 58 N.Y.2d 1009, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-powell-ny-1983.