People v. Powell
This text of 728 N.W.2d 433 (People v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Denise Louise POWELL, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 22, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in People v. Powell, 477 Mich. 860, 721 N.W.2d 180 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 N.W.2d 433, 477 Mich. 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-powell-mich-2007.