People v. Powe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Powe

54 A.D.2d 677, 387 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14214

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 677 (People v. Powe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Powe, 54 A.D.2d 677, 387 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

On this appeal from a judgment rendered on April 30, 1974 in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him to from 2 to 9 years imprisonment, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833; see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid applicable issue, and that the appeal is therefore frivolous. A copy of the brief has been furnished to defendant, and defendant has not chosen to submit anything to support his appeal. This court has made a careful review of the record and proceedings in this case, and agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised upon this appeal that are not frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur&emdash;Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On this appeal from a judgment rendered on April 30, 1974 in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him to from 2 to 9 years imprisonment, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833; see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid applicable issue, and that the appeal is therefore frivolous. A copy of the brief has been furnished to defendant, and defendant has not chosen to submit anything to support his appeal. This court has made a careful review of the record and proceedings in this case, and agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised upon this appeal that are not frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur&emdash;Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 677, 387 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-powe-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack