People v. Potts

121 A.D.3d 1022, 993 N.Y.S.2d 779
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 2014·No. 2012-04536·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), rendered October 4, 2011, convicting him of *1023 criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. The record indicates that, under the New York standard, defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709 [1988]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]). Moreover, the defendant was not deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel under the federal standard (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 687 [1984]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.P, Sgroi, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Potts, 121 A.D.3d 1022, 993 N.Y.S.2d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 1022 (People v. Potts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Mateo
811 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)