People v. Potter

165 N.Y.S.3d 776, 204 A.D.3d 1522, 2022 NY Slip Op 02920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Potter. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 A.D.3d 802
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2022·No. 371 KA 21-00509·Published

Opinion

People v Potter (2022 NY Slip Op 02920)
People v Potter
2022 NY Slip Op 02920
Decided on April 29, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 29, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

371 KA 21-00509

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

RICHARD POTTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


RYAN JAMES MULDOON, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRITTANY GROME ANTONACCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), rendered February 16, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: April 29, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Potter, 165 N.Y.S.3d 776, 204 A.D.3d 1522, 2022 NY Slip Op 02920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

165 N.Y.S.3d 776 (People v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431