People v. Potter

6 A.D.3d 813, 774 N.Y.S.2d 448, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3970
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 8, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A.D.3d 813 (People v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Potter, 6 A.D.3d 813, 774 N.Y.S.2d 448, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 25, 2001, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to five years’ probation as a youthful offender following his plea of guilty to the crimes of assault in the second degree and vehicular assault in the second degree. Defendant also pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and was sentenced to a fine and license revocation. Within approximately eight months of his probation defendant was charged with violating the terms of his probation; however, he was reinstated to probation. Thereafter, defendant was charged in a second violation of probation petition after his probation of[814]*814fleer observed defendant operating a motor vehicle upon leaving a probation appointment. Following a hearing, defendant was found to have violated the terms of his probation by operating a motor vehicle, probation was revoked and he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of lVs to 4 years on the assault convictions. Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence, particularly given defendant’s repeated violation of and flagrant disregard for the terms of his probation (see People v Chaires, 1 AD3d 630 [2003]; People v Bell, 255 AD2d 836 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 966 [1999]).

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sanders
47 A.D.3d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Parsons
15 A.D.3d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.3d 813, 774 N.Y.S.2d 448, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-potter-nyappdiv-2004.