People v. Porterfield
This text of 107 A.D.3d 1478 (People v. Porterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered August 25, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.80 [1] [a]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver encompasses defendant’s contention that [1479]*1479County Court erred in refusing to suppress his statements to the police (see People v Mack, 96 AD3d 1689, 1689 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 1027 [2012]; People v Aguayo, 37 AD3d 1081, 1081 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 981 [2007]), as well as his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255; People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.3d 1478, 965 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-porterfield-nyappdiv-2013.