People v. Popson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Popson

262 A.D.2d 989, 694 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 989 (People v. Popson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Popson, 262 A.D.2d 989, 694 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After being held for Grand Jury action on the charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 265.02 (1), defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.02 [4]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was convicted of a violent felony offense and thus that the sentence of lVs to 4 years imprisonment is illegal (see, Penal Law § 70.04 [former (4)]). “[A]ccording to the plain statutory language [of Penal Law § 70.02 (1) (d)], a class E violent felony offense is reserved for accuseds who plead guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as a lesser included offense under an indictment charging a greater offense” (People v Dickerson, 85 NY2d 870, 872). We also reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Because defendant’s notice of appeal limits the scope of the appeal to the sentence imposed, we do not address defendant’s remaining contention (see, Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, CPL 450.10, at 665-666; see also, People v Wallace, 246 AD2d 676; People v Stevens, 120 AD2d 553). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Attempted Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After being held for Grand Jury action on the charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 265.02 (1), defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.02 [4]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was convicted of a violent felony offense and thus that the sentence of lVs to 4 years imprisonment is illegal (see, Penal Law § 70.04 [former (4)]). “[A]ccording to the plain statutory language [of Penal Law § 70.02 (1) (d)], a class E violent felony offense is reserved for accuseds who plead guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as a lesser included offense under an indictment charging a greater offense” (People v Dickerson, 85 NY2d 870, 872). We also reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Because defendant’s notice of appeal limits the scope of the appeal to the sentence imposed, we do not address defendant’s remaining contention (see, Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, CPL 450.10, at 665-666; see also, People v Wallace, 246 AD2d 676; People v Stevens, 120 AD2d 553). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Attempted Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 989, 694 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-popson-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack