People v. Poppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Poppel

143 A.D.2d 854, 533 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 A.D.2d 854 (People v. Poppel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Poppel, 143 A.D.2d 854, 533 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Braatz, J.), rendered June 8, 1984, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. The evidence established that the defendant, as the driver of the getaway car, aided her companion in the burglary of a residence and shared his culpable intent (see, People v Keitt, 42 NY2d 926; People v Mercado, 114 AD2d 377; Penal Law § 20.00). Moreover upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Hooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Braatz, J.), rendered June 8, 1984, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. The evidence established that the defendant, as the driver of the getaway car, aided her companion in the burglary of a residence and shared his culpable intent (see, People v Keitt, 42 NY2d 926; People v Mercado, 114 AD2d 377; Penal Law § 20.00). Moreover upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Hooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D.2d 854, 533 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poppel-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack