People v. Poplis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Poplis

33 A.D.2d 743, 305 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Poplis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Poplis, 33 A.D.2d 743, 305 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Application unanimously granted, in the exercise of discretion and in the interests of justice, to the extent of providing that the testimony of a witness called by the prosecution who testified before the Judiciary Relations Committee of the Appellate Division shall be transmitted by the Committee to the trial court and may be made available to counsel by the Trial Justice after such witness has completed his direct testimony at the trial so that his testimony before the Judiciary Relations Committee on the “ handling of the Roxanne Felumero case ” may be available for use on cross-examination and for further use at the trail if counsel is so advised. In all other respects the application is denied. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Steuer, JJ.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application unanimously granted, in the exercise of discretion and in the interests of justice, to the extent of providing that the testimony of a witness called by the prosecution who testified before the Judiciary Relations Committee of the Appellate Division shall be transmitted by the Committee to the trial court and may be made available to counsel by the Trial Justice after such witness has completed his direct testimony at the trial so that his testimony before the Judiciary Relations Committee on the “ handling of the Roxanne Felumero case ” may be available for use on cross-examination and for further use at the trail if counsel is so advised. In all other respects the application is denied. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Steuer, JJ.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 743, 305 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poplis-nyappdiv-1969.