People v. Pope

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pope

53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13380

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 651 (People v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pope, 53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 30, 1974, convicting her of possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and indictment dismissed. On the record herein, it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to make it clear to the jury that the count of possession of weapons, etc., as limited by the People’s bill of particulars, applied only to the time of the incident (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Since appellant has served her sentence, the interest of justice will be accomplished in this case by the dismissal of the indictment (see People v Mitchell, 34 AD2d 690). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 30, 1974, convicting her of possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and indictment dismissed. On the record herein, it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to make it clear to the jury that the count of possession of weapons, etc., as limited by the People’s bill of particulars, applied only to the time of the incident (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Since appellant has served her sentence, the interest of justice will be accomplished in this case by the dismissal of the indictment (see People v Mitchell, 34 AD2d 690). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pope-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack