People v. Pope

California Court of Appeal

People v. Pope

174 P. 673, 37 Cal. App. 656, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 377

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 26, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 437.

StatusPublished

This text of 174 P. 673 (People v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pope, 174 P. 673, 37 Cal. App. 656, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 377 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was accused by information of the crime of rape alleged to have been committed on the-day,of May, 1917, his victim being of the age of eleven years. He was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to serve the term of fifteen years in the state prison at San Quentin. The crime was alleged and shown to have been committed on May 3, 1917, and prior to the passage or adoption of the new section 1168 to the Penal Code, relating to indeterminate sentences, and hence the sentence was properly imposed. (Ex parte Lee, 177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958].)

The transcript was filed January 18, 1918, and was placed upon the June calendar. No brief has been filed by defendant and he made no appearance at the call of the calendar. On motion of the attorney-general the cause was submitted on the record. Although not required to do so, we have examined the transcript of the evidence and rulings of the court, with the result that the verdict is shown to have support and that no prejudicial rulings appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was accused by information of the crime of rape alleged to have been committed on the-day,of May, 1917, his victim being of the age of eleven years. He was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to serve the term of fifteen years in the state prison at San Quentin. The crime was alleged and shown to have been committed on May 3, 1917, and prior to the passage or adoption of the new section 1168 to the Penal Code, relating to indeterminate sentences, and hence the sentence was properly imposed. (Ex parte Lee, 177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958].)

The transcript was filed January 18, 1918, and was placed upon the June calendar. No brief has been filed by defendant and he made no appearance at the call of the calendar. On motion of the attorney-general the cause was submitted on the record. Although not required to do so, we have examined the transcript of the evidence and rulings of the court, with the result that the verdict is shown to have support and that no prejudicial rulings appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 P. 673, 37 Cal. App. 656, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pope-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack