People v. Poole

155 A.D.2d 924, 549 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Poole. Read the opinion of the Court — 154 A.D.2d 560

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s sole contention is that the suppression court erred in finding that the police had probable cause for his warrantless arrest. The court properly found that the facts upon which the officer acted were sufficient to provide reasonable cause to believe that a crime had been committed and that defendant was the perpetrator (see, CPL 140.10; People v Moore, 47 NY2d 911; People v Marner, 47 NY2d 982, cert denied 444 US 971). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Poole, 155 A.D.2d 924, 549 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marner
393 N.E.2d 1036 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Moore
393 N.E.2d 489 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)