People v. Poole

197 N.W.2d 831, 39 Mich. App. 635
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 30, 1972
DocketDocket No. 11241
StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.W.2d 831 (People v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Poole, 197 N.W.2d 831, 39 Mich. App. 635 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted of larceny from a person, and appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.

Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.W.2d 831, 39 Mich. App. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poole-michctapp-1972.