People v. Ponce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ponce

257 A.D.2d 667, 682 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 667 (People v. Ponce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ponce, 257 A.D.2d 667, 682 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, [668]*668Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered August 13, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted reckless endangerment in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, [668]*668Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered August 13, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted reckless endangerment in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 667, 682 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ponce-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack