People v. Pompeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pompeo

114 A.D.2d 913, 495 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 913 (People v. Pompeo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pompeo, 114 A.D.2d 913, 495 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered March 27, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 [914]*914US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), both rendered March 27, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 [914]*914US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 913, 495 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pompeo-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack