People v. Pompeit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pompeit

167 A.D.2d 220, 562 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13578

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New [221]*221York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered May 15, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the court coerced him into pleading guilty has no merit. The court did not abuse its authority by denying defendant’s request for one more week to consider the outstanding plea offer. Defendant acknowledged that he was pleading guilty voluntarily and admitted his guilt; nor did defendant move to withdraw the plea prior to sentence. (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662.)

The negotiated sentence imposed on defendant was not an abuse of discretion. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302.) Defendant admitted a serious crime, and his prior criminal record is not insignificant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New [221]*221York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered May 15, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the court coerced him into pleading guilty has no merit. The court did not abuse its authority by denying defendant’s request for one more week to consider the outstanding plea offer. Defendant acknowledged that he was pleading guilty voluntarily and admitted his guilt; nor did defendant move to withdraw the plea prior to sentence. (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662.)

The negotiated sentence imposed on defendant was not an abuse of discretion. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302.) Defendant admitted a serious crime, and his prior criminal record is not insignificant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

People v. Pompeit, 167 A.D.2d 220, 562 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

167 A.D.2d 220 (People v. Pompeit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related