People v. Polo

2018 NY Slip Op 4087
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 2018
Docket6801 407/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 4087 (People v. Polo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Polo, 2018 NY Slip Op 4087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Polo (2018 NY Slip Op 04087)
People v Polo
2018 NY Slip Op 04087
Decided on June 7, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 7, 2018
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Kapnick, Singh, JJ.

6801 407/16

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Rafael Polo, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Diana J. Lewis of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J. at suppression motion and plea; John W. Carter, J. at sentencing), rendered November 28, 2016, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, which forecloses his suppression and excessive sentence claims. The court's oral colloquy with defendant concerning the waiver avoided conflating the right to appeal with the rights normally forfeited upon a guilty plea, and it satisfied the standards for such a colloquy (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094 [2016]). After consulting with counsel, defendant also signed a written waiver that thoroughly explained the rights he was relinquishing, and the record shows that he understood the waiver.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 7, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 4087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-polo-nyappdiv-2018.