People v. Pollack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pollack

26 A.D.2d 625, 272 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 19, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 625 (People v. Pollack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pollack, 26 A.D.2d 625, 272 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment rendered on December 14, 1964, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the first degree and sentencing him to a term of not less than four years nor more than five years, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Defendant’s arguments are not persuasive. However, in view of his substantial co-operation with the Government in a recent prosecution in the Federal courts, and after consideration of the recommendations of the District Attorney of New York County and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, a reduction of sentence to the extent above directed is deemed consonant with the public interest and interests of justice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager, and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment rendered on December 14, 1964, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the first degree and sentencing him to a term of not less than four years nor more than five years, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Defendant’s arguments are not persuasive. However, in view of his substantial co-operation with the Government in a recent prosecution in the Federal courts, and after consideration of the recommendations of the District Attorney of New York County and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, a reduction of sentence to the extent above directed is deemed consonant with the public interest and interests of justice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager, and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 625, 272 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pollack-nyappdiv-1966.