People v. Polk

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Polk

229 N.W.2d 374, 59 Mich. App. 191, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1334

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1975

DocketDocket 19743

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 229 N.W.2d 374 (People v. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Polk, 229 N.W.2d 374, 59 Mich. App. 191, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1334 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

*192 Per Curiam.

Dr. John E. Polk was arrested in the City of Detroit for violation of the Controlled Substances Act, MCLA 335.341(l)(b); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(b). On February 4, 1974, Recorder’s Court Judge John R. Murphy, sitting as an examining magistrate, dismissed the complaint and warrant, and discharged defendant. The people filed a claim of appeal in this Court. We conclude that the claim of appeal was improvidently accepted, and the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The proper and exclusive remedy for review by the people of a magistrate’s determination to discharge an accused at the conclusion of a preliminary examination is by means of filing an original civil complaint for an order of superintending control, which must be filed in circuit court. See People v Flint Municipal Judge, 383 Mich 429, 431-432; 175 NW2d 750, 751-752 (1970), People v Paille #1, 383 Mich 605; 178 NW2d 469 (1970), People v Cason, 387 Mich 586; 198 NW2d 292 (1972), Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v Recorder’s Court Judge, 27 Mich App 419; 183 NW2d 577 (1970), and Gray v Recorder’s Court Judges, 51 Mich App 386, 391-392; 215 NW2d 198, 201-202 (1974). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed.

We note in passing that the main question sought to be decided by the people in this appeal has been settled contrary to the position of the people in People v Kerwin, 56 Mich App 483; 224 NW2d 113 (1974).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*192 Per Curiam.

Dr. John E. Polk was arrested in the City of Detroit for violation of the Controlled Substances Act, MCLA 335.341(l)(b); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(b). On February 4, 1974, Recorder’s Court Judge John R. Murphy, sitting as an examining magistrate, dismissed the complaint and warrant, and discharged defendant. The people filed a claim of appeal in this Court. We conclude that the claim of appeal was improvidently accepted, and the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The proper and exclusive remedy for review by the people of a magistrate’s determination to discharge an accused at the conclusion of a preliminary examination is by means of filing an original civil complaint for an order of superintending control, which must be filed in circuit court. See People v Flint Municipal Judge, 383 Mich 429, 431-432; 175 NW2d 750, 751-752 (1970), People v Paille #1, 383 Mich 605; 178 NW2d 469 (1970), People v Cason, 387 Mich 586; 198 NW2d 292 (1972), Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v Recorder’s Court Judge, 27 Mich App 419; 183 NW2d 577 (1970), and Gray v Recorder’s Court Judges, 51 Mich App 386, 391-392; 215 NW2d 198, 201-202 (1974). Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed.

We note in passing that the main question sought to be decided by the people in this appeal has been settled contrary to the position of the people in People v Kerwin, 56 Mich App 483; 224 NW2d 113 (1974).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 N.W.2d 374, 59 Mich. App. 191, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-polk-michctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack