People v. Polizio

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Polizio

83 N.E.2d 861, 298 N.Y. 814

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 6, 1949·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal the following question was presented and necessarily passed upon, viz.: The appellant contended that the use against Mm upon the trial of evidence acquired by illegal search and seizure violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the conviction herein does not deny due process. No opinion.

Concur: Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway, DesmoNd, Dye and JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal the following question was presented and necessarily passed upon, viz.: The appellant contended that the use against Mm upon the trial of evidence acquired by illegal search and seizure violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the conviction herein does not deny due process. No opinion.

Concur: Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway, DesmoNd, Dye and JJ.

People v. Polizio, 83 N.E.2d 861, 298 N.Y. 814 (N.Y. 1949).

Pincite

83 N.E.2d 861 (People v. Polizio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.