People v. Polin
This text of 63 A.D.3d 1180 (People v. Polin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), rendered January 4, 2007, convicting him of burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecutor’s comments during summation were either fair comment on the evidence, responsive to the defense counsel’s summation, or not so egregious as to have denied the defendant a fair trial (see People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821 [1993]; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399 [1981]; People v Bailey, 54 AD3d 419, 420 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.E, Angiolillo, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 A.D.3d 1180, 881 N.Y.S.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-polin-nyappdiv-2009.