People v. Policastro

142 A.D.3d 679, 36 N.Y.S.3d 827
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 2014-10365·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), all imposed October 10, 2014, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Policastro, 142 A.D.3d 679, 36 N.Y.S.3d 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 679 (People v. Policastro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
2019 NY Slip Op 4964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Phillips
2019 NY Slip Op 4414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Pelige
2019 NY Slip Op 4204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Gomez
2018 NY Slip Op 8144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Muniz
2018 NY Slip Op 5060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Munoz
2017 NY Slip Op 7278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)